/Music


Stay tuned for the latest music from around the world on platforms such as Spotify, Youtube, Apple Music, etc.


Members: 3
Join


Moderated by: mozzapp
up
2
up
moniq 1781706905 [Music] 1 comments
## But did grunge really "kill" hair metal, or was it already dying on its own? Probably both. Hair metal was already showing clear signs of creative exhaustion by the late '80s, recycling formulas that worked well enough that nobody felt the need to change anything. But Nevermind was what delivered the final blow: in under three months, it made an entire generation feel vaguely embarrassed by the whole leather-and-big-hair aesthetic. ## The dates This wasn't a slow process. It happened fast, and you can trace it. **August 1991** — Nirvana releases *Nevermind*. Produced by Butch Vig on a relatively modest budget by the standards of the time. **September 24, 1991** — The record hits stores. Fifty thousand copies sold on the first day in the US, already more than DGC Records had projected for the entire first week. **January 11, 1992** — *Nevermind* bumps Michael Jackson off the top of the Billboard 200. The music press covered this moment extensively, and understandably so. Nobody saw it coming. **February 1992** — MTV starts playing *Smells Like Teen Spirit* in heavy rotation. That accelerated everything in a way radio alone couldn't have managed. **March 1992** — Bands like Poison, Warrant, and Winger start losing major label contracts. Not all at once, but the pattern was consistent enough to become a story. **September 1992** — Alice in Chains releases *Dirt*. Critics received it well at the time, and so did the public. It's one of the most coherent records of that whole period. **October 1993** — Nirvana releases *In Utero*, deliberately rougher-sounding than *Nevermind*. Cobain made no secret in interviews that he didn't want to repeat the polished sound of the previous record. **April 5, 1994** — Kurt Cobain is found dead in Seattle. What followed was, in large part, the industry trying to process what had been lost. **1994–1995** — Grunge begins to be absorbed by the same industry machinery that had absorbed hair metal before it. The cycle closed. ## Who pulled the trigger The transition was collective. But there was a clear difference between who started it and who solidified it. **Nirvana** was the most obvious turning point. *Nevermind* broke through to the mainstream in a way no other Seattle band had managed, and Cobain became, almost against his will, the face of a shift that was bigger than he was. **Pearl Jam** gave grunge a more accessible and durable shape. *Ten* came out before *Nevermind* had exploded, but the band grew alongside the wave and ended up outlasting almost everyone through the decade. **Soundgarden** was, musically, the heaviest and most experimental of the four major acts. Chris Cornell had a vocal range that few singers in any genre could compete with, and that became more apparent in retrospect than it seemed at the time. **Alice in Chains** is, for a lot of people, the most underrated case. *Dirt* is a record about addiction that makes no attempt to soften what it's saying. No hair metal band would have made that record, or wanted to. **Mudhoney** technically came before all of them. The Sub Pop scene was the laboratory where the sound was developed before anyone outside Seattle was paying attention. **Stone Temple Pilots** were criticized at the time for sounding derivative. With distance, the reading is more generous. They reached audiences that the Seattle bands didn't always reach as easily. **Smashing Pumpkins** and **Green Day** arrived from different directions — one more introspective and dense, the other more punk and direct — but both helped establish that there was room for a lot more than pure grunge. ## How the community reacted Hair metal fans reacted in various ways, but denial was common. A lot of people assumed Nirvana was a trend, that the hair and leather would come back. MTV cancelled *Headbangers Ball* in 1995, and classic rock radio stations gradually reduced airplay for the LA bands throughout 1992 and 1993. It wasn't a coordinated decision, but the effect looked a lot like one. The musicians who were in the middle of hair metal faced complicated choices. Some tried to adapt with mixed results. Aerosmith survived reasonably well, but they had a solid enough foundation to fall back on. Smaller bands weren't as lucky. Warrant, Firehouse, Winger — they all continued existing in some form, but lost access to the mainstream in a way they never fully recovered from. On the label side, what followed was a scramble to find "the next Nirvana." That resulted in inflated contracts for a large number of alternative bands that weren't built to handle the pressure of a second album. Most of them disappeared quickly. The Seattle scene, for its part, found itself in an awkward relationship with its own success. Sub Pop was a small independent label that suddenly became a national reference point. Cobain spent much of his final years talking openly about his discomfort with having become what he'd become. That's not revisionist history — it's documented in interviews from the time. ## What remained Grunge was canonized. Not in the vague sense of "it matters," but in concrete terms: *Nevermind* shows up in music curriculum reading lists, Cobain has become the subject of academic work, Pearl Jam still fills arenas in 2024. That level of staying power wasn't obvious in 1994. Hair metal, somewhat unexpectedly, also survived — as nostalgia. Def Leppard, Poison, and Mötley Crüe have all done large and reportedly profitable tours in recent decades. The audiences at those shows knew what they were paying to feel, and that's different from being culturally active or fashionable. It's something else. Not necessarily lesser, just different. What becomes clearer with distance is that the shift in 1991 was more about credibility than sound. Grunge wasn't technically superior in any objective sense. But it arrived communicating something that felt true to a specific generation, and hair metal, at that point, didn't have much left to offer beyond what it had already offered. Whether grunge "saved" rock or simply reorganized its priorities for a few years is still something people debate. What seems more reasonable to say is that the transition was real, it happened fast, and neither side came out quite the same as it went in.
up
0
up
mozzapp 1781707095
Nevermind just confirmed that that style was in the toilet

A social news and discussion community